Search for: "Does 2-100 inclusive"
Results 1 - 20
of 784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Does your company offer volunteer activities? [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Does your company offer volunteer activities? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
While the ruling does not apply to employers overall, the rationale and language from the opinion may suggest the Court’s willingness to limit employers’ ability to enact certain diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in the future. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
While the ruling does not apply to employers overall, the rationale and language from the opinion may suggest the Court’s willingness to limit employers’ ability to enact certain diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in the future. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
While the ruling does not apply to employers overall, the rationale and language from the opinion may suggest the Court’s willingness to limit employers’ ability to enact certain diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in the future. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
And, in its latest authoritative rendering, appears in the form of a draft General Assembly Resolution: Promotion of inclusive and effective international tax cooperation at the United Nations A/C.2/78/L.18/Rev.1 (15 November 2023) approved by the UN Second COmmittee at its 78th Session: By that text, titled “Promotion of inclusive and effective international tax cooperation at the United Nations” (document A/C.2/78/L.18/Rev.1), the Assembly would… [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:21 am
A study a decade or two ago found that thirty percent or so of the faculty at the top 100 law schools identify as Jewish. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:27 am
Adding a border adjustment to a 20 percent (tax-inclusive) VAT would increase foreigners’ wealth by $2 trillion and reduce Americans’ wealth by $2 trillion. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
Last, the OTA determined the FTB failed to carry its burden to show the taxpayer’s inclusion of 100 percent of repatriated dividends in the sales factor denominator is distortive under Cal. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:16 am
My suggestion: In section 18(2) of O.Reg. 48/01 (above), replace the word "inclusive" with "exclusive. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
Shaeffer also alleged that the label was “unlawful” under the UCL because it does not comply with two of the five prerequisites that must be satisfied before a label may state “no sugar added” under a federal labeling regulation: (1) “the [product] that [Cuties Juice] resembles and for which it substitutes”—that is, “100% tangerine juice”—does not “normally contain added sugars,” and… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
The opposition was filed based on the grounds of Article 100(b) (lack of sufficient disclosure) and 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Articles 52(1) and 54(1),(2) EPC (lack of novelty), and on the following sole document:D1: EP 2 327 810 A1.III. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
After all, if my business pays me $100 and both its tax rate and mine are 35%, then deduction and inclusion, instead of neither, saves the business $35 of tax and costs me $35 of tax. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am
The debate focused on the pending objections under Article 100(a) and (b) EPC raised with regard to claim 1 of the patent as granted.XI. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:13 am
Then $2 of current year capital income implies an asset worth $100, while an asset worth $100 implies $2 of current year income. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are currently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:32 am
To date, the USPTO has granted more than 100 petitions and has more than 50 others pending. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Likewise, the inclusion of two non-majority Muslim nations, North Korea and Venezuela, does not persuasively show a lack of religious purpose behind the Proclamation. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am
The Board found that the inclusion of the additional independent claim 1, based on claims 1 and 2 as granted in combination with features taken from the description, was no longer simply occasioned by a ground for opposition since this ground was already addressed through the filing of independent claim 2. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
” Does “whoever” imply a person, and not a machine? [read post]
